Have you accepted him into your life, anons? Why or why not?
Anonymous :
4 days ago :
No.6172
>>6176
>>6172
I am OP and I agree with you, I think. Nu atheism and trad LARP are both angst against different breeds of parents. I don't have an agenda, it was just a question.
So, anyway, have you?
The return to pushing "classical" Christianity without context of the 20th century reads to me like it came from the same cringe rebellious thread that the so lamented new age atheists were born and maligned of.
Anonymous :
4 days ago :
No.6176
>>6227
>>6176
I think it can be LARP (see: epic ultramontane Jansenist Marcionite tradcath Twitter populated by homosexual 19 year olds) or it can come from a genuine conversion, or at least desire for one.
>>6172
The return to pushing "classical" Christianity without context of the 20th century reads to me like it came from the same cringe rebellious thread that the so lamented new age atheists were born and maligned of.
I am OP and I agree with you, I think. Nu atheism and trad LARP are both angst against different breeds of parents. I don't have an agenda, it was just a question.
So, anyway, have you?
Anonymous :
4 days ago :
No.6177
>>6191
>>6177
You are going to Hell.
>>6209 >>6231>>6177
>empirically
Please do not do to this word what normies did to "ontologically"
>>6235>>6177
>If that sounds like missing the point of Catholicism to you dipshit tradcath larpers, empirically it isn't if that's how most cultural Catholics in the world act, and anyway, it's more like I'm purposefully avoiding the point.
"Empirical Christianity" is such a funny concept. It is probably the best justification for protestantism one can imagine.
>>6231
He used it correctly though.
95% of people using "ontologically" think it just means "really".
No, nor will I. I appreciate being nominally Catholic because important milestones in my and my family's lives get marked with some ceremony and sanctity. I'm not going to torture myself with rules I disagree with beyond that.
(If that sounds like missing the point of Catholicism to you dipshit tradcath larpers, empirically it isn't if that's how most cultural Catholics in the world act, and anyway, it's more like I'm purposefully avoiding the point.)
I'm ambivalent-to-positive about Jesus, but I really do despise the rapey-sounding "have you invited him in" phrasing that American Christians use so much.
>>6177
No, nor will I. I appreciate being nominally Catholic because important milestones in my and my family's lives get marked with some ceremony and sanctity. I'm not going to torture myself with rules I disagree with beyond that.
(If that sounds like missing the point of Catholicism to you dipshit tradcath larpers, empirically it isn't if that's how most cultural Catholics in the world act, and anyway, it's more like I'm purposefully avoiding the point.)
You are going to Hell.
>>6177
No, nor will I. I appreciate being nominally Catholic because important milestones in my and my family's lives get marked with some ceremony and sanctity. I'm not going to torture myself with rules I disagree with beyond that.
(If that sounds like missing the point of Catholicism to you dipshit tradcath larpers, empirically it isn't if that's how most cultural Catholics in the world act, and anyway, it's more like I'm purposefully avoiding the point.)
What rules do you disagree with?
>>6180No, I haven't. Not principally against it per se, but I think my life would have to take some bizarre turns before it would seem like a good idea.
What do you mean by you are not principally against it, but it does not seem like a good idea?
>>6176
>>6172
I am OP and I agree with you, I think. Nu atheism and trad LARP are both angst against different breeds of parents. I don't have an agenda, it was just a question.
So, anyway, have you?
I think it can be LARP (see: epic ultramontane Jansenist Marcionite tradcath Twitter populated by homosexual 19 year olds) or it can come from a genuine conversion, or at least desire for one.
Raised as an atheist and will never buy into it, sorry. I accept divinity and whatnot, but not Jesus.
Anonymous :
2 days ago :
No.6231
>>6235
>>6177
>If that sounds like missing the point of Catholicism to you dipshit tradcath larpers, empirically it isn't if that's how most cultural Catholics in the world act, and anyway, it's more like I'm purposefully avoiding the point.
"Empirical Christianity" is such a funny concept. It is probably the best justification for protestantism one can imagine.
>>6231
He used it correctly though.
95% of people using "ontologically" think it just means "really".
>>6236>>6231
There is zero empirical evidence that points toward any higher-consciousness (that is, through your lens, your typical monotheistic deity-of-a-death-cult created by a desert tribe.
There is NO mandatory mediation between [whatever You define as You/"I"] and divinity/spirituality that REQUIRES a Judeo-Christian conception of "God".
>>6177
No, nor will I. I appreciate being nominally Catholic because important milestones in my and my family's lives get marked with some ceremony and sanctity. I'm not going to torture myself with rules I disagree with beyond that.
(If that sounds like missing the point of Catholicism to you dipshit tradcath larpers, empirically it isn't if that's how most cultural Catholics in the world act, and anyway, it's more like I'm purposefully avoiding the point.)
>empirically
Please do not do to this word what normies did to "ontologically"
Anonymous :
2 days ago :
No.6235
>>6264
>>6235
Is 'empirical christianity' a funny concept or is it just being a lower-case c conservative but more self-aware? Most people participate in the rituals of their culture without being perfectly intentional about all of their context and meaning, regardless of their religion. You can become born again and extra spiritual, or you can simply enjoy the social functions of your traditions but find your transcendence in something totally different that speaks to you personally.
>>6177
No, nor will I. I appreciate being nominally Catholic because important milestones in my and my family's lives get marked with some ceremony and sanctity. I'm not going to torture myself with rules I disagree with beyond that.
(If that sounds like missing the point of Catholicism to you dipshit tradcath larpers, empirically it isn't if that's how most cultural Catholics in the world act, and anyway, it's more like I'm purposefully avoiding the point.)
>If that sounds like missing the point of Catholicism to you dipshit tradcath larpers, empirically it isn't if that's how most cultural Catholics in the world act, and anyway, it's more like I'm purposefully avoiding the point.
"Empirical Christianity" is such a funny concept. It is probably the best justification for protestantism one can imagine.
>>6231>>6177
>empirically
Please do not do to this word what normies did to "ontologically"
He used it correctly though.
95% of people using "ontologically" think it just means "really".
Anonymous :
2 days ago :
No.6236
>>6240
>>6236
Creatio ex nilhio requires a God
Aquinas proves God's characteristics include intelligence and lovingness
Read more.
>>6231
>>6177
>empirically
Please do not do to this word what normies did to "ontologically"
There is zero empirical evidence that points toward any higher-consciousness (that is, through your lens, your typical monotheistic deity-of-a-death-cult created by a desert tribe.
There is NO mandatory mediation between [whatever You define as You/"I"] and divinity/spirituality that REQUIRES a Judeo-Christian conception of "God".
>>6236
>>6231
There is zero empirical evidence that points toward any higher-consciousness (that is, through your lens, your typical monotheistic deity-of-a-death-cult created by a desert tribe.
There is NO mandatory mediation between [whatever You define as You/"I"] and divinity/spirituality that REQUIRES a Judeo-Christian conception of "God".
Creatio ex nilhio requires a God
Aquinas proves God's characteristics include intelligence and lovingness
Read more.
>>6235
>>6177
>If that sounds like missing the point of Catholicism to you dipshit tradcath larpers, empirically it isn't if that's how most cultural Catholics in the world act, and anyway, it's more like I'm purposefully avoiding the point.
"Empirical Christianity" is such a funny concept. It is probably the best justification for protestantism one can imagine.
>>6231
He used it correctly though.
95% of people using "ontologically" think it just means "really".
Is 'empirical christianity' a funny concept or is it just being a lower-case c conservative but more self-aware? Most people participate in the rituals of their culture without being perfectly intentional about all of their context and meaning, regardless of their religion. You can become born again and extra spiritual, or you can simply enjoy the social functions of your traditions but find your transcendence in something totally different that speaks to you personally.