/pt/ – Petrarchan

I do not ascribe to chudjak teachings but this deserves its obligatory "nothing ever happens".

As for me, I know it's selfish but I kind of want something significant to happen in the hopes that it will snap me out of the rut I've been in for the last couple years

Iran has no state allies, so nobody is going to join them, no support besides decimated militias so no ww3 is happening.

Not WW3, but this is the multipolarity that American foreign policy critics think they want.

I'm not feeling it

I'm out of the loop. What's going on?

The girls are fighting anon (Iran & Israel), Israel wants to drag us into the fight

>>5595 (OP) Hasn't it already started in 2022?

Iran gets bombed. They launch a few missiles, a lot of which get intercepted. Iran claims victory. We’ve seen this song and dance before twice last year. If nothing else happens then no we ain’t doing war with Iran and it’ll be a nothingburger like India-Pakistan 2025. Otherwise, a lot of bad things will happen.

Iran has no allies to escalate the conflict and they have no viable delivery system for nukes unlike North Korea. Even their conventional missiles are too slow to do any damage.

>5603 If it weren't for our undying loyalty to the Zionist Entity this whole thing wouldn't concern us at all

The general tenor of conflict has changed. Both China and recently the US have made explicit statements about de-escalation. I think there is a good chance that, overall, the human race has moved on from World War-style grant conflict into smaller, localized low level bouts over capital and land. It's not a very enlightened place as we reached it via valuing capital flow more than the supremacy of the nation state, but it's something. In that sense, I am team Chudjak. But I think our current heightened anxiety and sensitivity to eschaton scale collapse obscur this change in international relations. I think I can safely say this is broadly the consensus of academics in that field, and other fields that deal with global relations like economics and technology.

The Chudjack always wins in the end

>>5627

>5603 If it weren't for our undying loyalty to the Zionist Entity this whole thing wouldn't concern us at all

Lmao. Always pathetic when people do the impotent linguistic protest thing. You don't understand geopolitics. America is already in near maximum head in sand position, you just don't appreciate it's a Godzilla sized ostrich.

>5666 Ominous digits... Anyways, the conflict is escalating and the US is sending military aid to their Greatest Ally. If not WW3, it may very well lead to it, like the many wars that led to WW2 and WW1.

If it were WW3 you would know. There would be not doubt. America might blow up Fordow though.

Probably WW3 will just be nuke lobbing.

Quickest way to nuke lobbing is lots of countries with nukes. Easiest way to prevent lots of countries with nukes is to bomb the fuck out of countries which try to nuclearize. Really we've done a good job of that policy except the couple of decades we spent bombing Iraq instead of North Korea.

>> 5666 > muh geopolitics enlighten me then instead of making vague insinuations also calling them the Zionist Entity will never not be funny, suck my dick

>>5751

>> 5666 > muh geopolitics enlighten me then instead of making vague insinuations also calling them the Zionist Entity will never not be funny, suck my dick

I'm not explaining introductory IR theory to someone acting like a teenager. That's what university is for.