What strange energy this photo had. Not quite Freudian but tending in that direction. Elon with his tongue-biting and saucy posing and Trump in his natural WWE skit milieu.
Anonymous :
38 days ago :
No.4968
>>4978
>>4968 (OP)
Really does look like Elon just got finished going down on him.
>>4968 (OP)
Really does look like Elon just got finished going down on him.
It’s peak 2025core.
"everything's computers" is one of his quotes of all time
Why are people so obsessed with Trump (good or bad) and act as if he is, or has been, in any way shape or form, any different than any other affluent wealthy trust fund baby throughout the entire course of human history?
Anonymous :
37 days ago :
No.4989
>>5004
>>4989
Wow anon, you're right. I spawned into this world yesterday and Trump has been the first "President" I have ever seen.
Personally, I think it's something to do with the internet era, the current generation (myself included) growing up with the internet and its subsequent concept of everything everywhere always shown/aired/visible as everything and anything the man does is seen and recorded and commented on.
And of course, much of it would be obligatory celebrity worship because humans put other richfags on pedestals to idolize them.
>>4987
Why are people so obsessed with Trump (good or bad) and act as if he is, or has been, in any way shape or form, any different than any other affluent wealthy trust fund baby throughout the entire course of human history?
Maybe because he's the President.
Anon, if it calms your jímis I have a bunch of pics in my meme directories of other politicians like Biden and Xi Jinping etc
Anonymous :
37 days ago :
No.5004
>>5059
>>5004
He's the first president we've seen who really and truly has no sense of shame. He has internalized the "all press is good press" lesson to a superhuman degree, none of the choices he makes every day have the slightest bit more thought behind him than the ones he made on live wrestling or reality shows.
Every other president has, if not really taken the office seriously, at least pretended to do so because they took themselves seriously and wanted to play the role as The President. Trump just sees it as something he happens to be doing for a little while.
>>4989
>>4987
Maybe because he's the President.
Wow anon, you're right. I spawned into this world yesterday and Trump has been the first "President" I have ever seen.
Personally, I think it's something to do with the internet era, the current generation (myself included) growing up with the internet and its subsequent concept of everything everywhere always shown/aired/visible as everything and anything the man does is seen and recorded and commented on.
And of course, much of it would be obligatory celebrity worship because humans put other richfags on pedestals to idolize them.
Anonymous :
36 days ago :
No.5059
>>5060
>>5059
Great tweet. A nation has no responsibly to any but its founding stock.
Trump is the first since Wilson to even slightly recognize that responsibility
>>5004
>>4989
Wow anon, you're right. I spawned into this world yesterday and Trump has been the first "President" I have ever seen.
Personally, I think it's something to do with the internet era, the current generation (myself included) growing up with the internet and its subsequent concept of everything everywhere always shown/aired/visible as everything and anything the man does is seen and recorded and commented on.
And of course, much of it would be obligatory celebrity worship because humans put other richfags on pedestals to idolize them.
He's the first president we've seen who really and truly has no sense of shame. He has internalized the "all press is good press" lesson to a superhuman degree, none of the choices he makes every day have the slightest bit more thought behind him than the ones he made on live wrestling or reality shows.
Every other president has, if not really taken the office seriously, at least pretended to do so because they took themselves seriously and wanted to play the role as The President. Trump just sees it as something he happens to be doing for a little while.
>>5059
>>5004
He's the first president we've seen who really and truly has no sense of shame. He has internalized the "all press is good press" lesson to a superhuman degree, none of the choices he makes every day have the slightest bit more thought behind him than the ones he made on live wrestling or reality shows.
Every other president has, if not really taken the office seriously, at least pretended to do so because they took themselves seriously and wanted to play the role as The President. Trump just sees it as something he happens to be doing for a little while.
Great tweet. A nation has no responsibly to any but its founding stock.
Trump is the first since Wilson to even slightly recognize that responsibility
Anonymous :
36 days ago :
No.5063
>>5088
>>5063
What's even objectionable about that statement? States should prioritize their citizens
Your shit is SO played out; I wish you would go back to Kiwifarms or 4chan.
There was an irritating jerkoff who posted like you in r/redscarepod years ago, was that you?
Anonymous :
35 days ago :
No.5088
>>5095
So this isn't about the actual subject of debate but rather that person and what his language represents >>5088... there is a certain kind of super patriotic American rightoid online that tries real hard to reconcile traditional race-based bigotry with the fact that they live on someone else's continent; and further, that they don't have any relation to Europeans. So the big thing they do is emphasize "founding stock" American-ness-- descent from the first English groups in the 17th century. They get really obsessed with how every generation of assimilated immigrants makes the original vision of that society even worse. I do appreciate that they remain consistent in their emphasis on that specific group of Anglo Saxon people because they dunk on groups everyone's already forgot about like Irish and Italians ("Ellis Islanders" is their term for them). They make a big stink about nobody outside of this founder group talking about America in any shape or form. In his head he's desperately reading clues into my posting to see who I am and if I've ever even been to America. If you say you have, well you're not part of the founding stock obviously, since your rhetoric is that of outsider commenting in, so you're excluded before the debate has already begun.
These guys are like the closest you're going to get to an American "intellectual" on the right, but they still do the irritating thing of shifting language to always make you chase their starting points, just like a lot of leftists do. Make no mistake, this one might be a little more well-spoken but the elephant in the room is that it represents, more or less, the opinion of a lot of Americans who have started grasping onto this historical/ethnic locus as a sort of bludgeoning tool towards those they don't like.
American Blacks aren't free from this tendency either (see: ADOS). In a way it is a logical position to take for those personality types who seek power in society. I think American Natives are the only group that get a legitimate gripe about all this shit in my own opinion.
>>5063
Your shit is SO played out; I wish you would go back to Kiwifarms or 4chan.
There was an irritating jerkoff who posted like you in r/redscarepod years ago, was that you?
What's even objectionable about that statement? States should prioritize their citizens
There's nothing objectionable about saying states should prioritize their citizens, although plenty of libs would disagree and call you racist. But citizens and founding stock are two very different things, at least in America. If you want citizenism—as Steve Sailer calls it—to succeed, you probably need to accept that.
Anonymous :
35 days ago :
No.5095
>>5114
>>5095
Concern about founding stock takes things too far, but it's reasonable to dislike your government doing more to help immigrants than natives. Especially with black people, who've seen programs meant to help them largely benefit upper-class foreigners while they continue to rot in slums.
>>5123>>5095
Doesn't change that Black people built this country. Your psychoanalyzing changes nothing.
So this isn't about the actual subject of debate but rather that person and what his language represents >>5088
>>5063
What's even objectionable about that statement? States should prioritize their citizens
... there is a certain kind of super patriotic American rightoid online that tries real hard to reconcile traditional race-based bigotry with the fact that they live on someone else's continent; and further, that they don't have any relation to Europeans. So the big thing they do is emphasize "founding stock" American-ness-- descent from the first English groups in the 17th century. They get really obsessed with how every generation of assimilated immigrants makes the original vision of that society even worse. I do appreciate that they remain consistent in their emphasis on that specific group of Anglo Saxon people because they dunk on groups everyone's already forgot about like Irish and Italians ("Ellis Islanders" is their term for them). They make a big stink about nobody outside of this founder group talking about America in any shape or form. In his head he's desperately reading clues into my posting to see who I am and if I've ever even been to America. If you say you have, well you're not part of the founding stock obviously, since your rhetoric is that of outsider commenting in, so you're excluded before the debate has already begun.
These guys are like the closest you're going to get to an American "intellectual" on the right, but they still do the irritating thing of shifting language to always make you chase their starting points, just like a lot of leftists do. Make no mistake, this one might be a little more well-spoken but the elephant in the room is that it represents, more or less, the opinion of a lot of Americans who have started grasping onto this historical/ethnic locus as a sort of bludgeoning tool towards those they don't like.
American Blacks aren't free from this tendency either (see: ADOS). In a way it is a logical position to take for those personality types who seek power in society. I think American Natives are the only group that get a legitimate gripe about all this shit in my own opinion.
>>5095
So this isn't about the actual subject of debate but rather that person and what his language represents >>5088... there is a certain kind of super patriotic American rightoid online that tries real hard to reconcile traditional race-based bigotry with the fact that they live on someone else's continent; and further, that they don't have any relation to Europeans. So the big thing they do is emphasize "founding stock" American-ness-- descent from the first English groups in the 17th century. They get really obsessed with how every generation of assimilated immigrants makes the original vision of that society even worse. I do appreciate that they remain consistent in their emphasis on that specific group of Anglo Saxon people because they dunk on groups everyone's already forgot about like Irish and Italians ("Ellis Islanders" is their term for them). They make a big stink about nobody outside of this founder group talking about America in any shape or form. In his head he's desperately reading clues into my posting to see who I am and if I've ever even been to America. If you say you have, well you're not part of the founding stock obviously, since your rhetoric is that of outsider commenting in, so you're excluded before the debate has already begun.
These guys are like the closest you're going to get to an American "intellectual" on the right, but they still do the irritating thing of shifting language to always make you chase their starting points, just like a lot of leftists do. Make no mistake, this one might be a little more well-spoken but the elephant in the room is that it represents, more or less, the opinion of a lot of Americans who have started grasping onto this historical/ethnic locus as a sort of bludgeoning tool towards those they don't like.
American Blacks aren't free from this tendency either (see: ADOS). In a way it is a logical position to take for those personality types who seek power in society. I think American Natives are the only group that get a legitimate gripe about all this shit in my own opinion.
Concern about founding stock takes things too far, but it's reasonable to dislike your government doing more to help immigrants than natives. Especially with black people, who've seen programs meant to help them largely benefit upper-class foreigners while they continue to rot in slums.
Putting aside Your government supports these people because they create more capita per GDP. They follow the gravy train and not the other way around. Many Americans lack will where the immigration process selects for those that want to achieve more. America has a degenerate culture after decades of concerted effort by spooks to handicap native populations by attacking their social structure. That we can agree on, but the egocentric tantrum that comes afterwards by Americans about how none of this is their fault, it's everyone else for being immigrants and not theirs for making the poor choices and behaving badly makes you look retarded to everyone looking in. It is no coincidence that every immigrant group from the poorest to the richest all sing one variation of this song or another.
Anonymous :
35 days ago :
No.5123
>>5161
>>5123 Don't bark at me like I'm in your bootcamp. I didn't say one word about your ancestors. In fact the entire point I was making is that people like YOU overemphasize how much they themselves get to draw on what their ancestors did. I am of the opinion that you don't actually have that much in common with your ancestors, socially, culturally, anything but your genes, which is a very flimsy and unfortunate thing to base your temper on no matter where or who your background is.
PS talking about something in the general isn't "psychoanalyzing", what a banal thought-ending cliche.
>>5095
So this isn't about the actual subject of debate but rather that person and what his language represents >>5088... there is a certain kind of super patriotic American rightoid online that tries real hard to reconcile traditional race-based bigotry with the fact that they live on someone else's continent; and further, that they don't have any relation to Europeans. So the big thing they do is emphasize "founding stock" American-ness-- descent from the first English groups in the 17th century. They get really obsessed with how every generation of assimilated immigrants makes the original vision of that society even worse. I do appreciate that they remain consistent in their emphasis on that specific group of Anglo Saxon people because they dunk on groups everyone's already forgot about like Irish and Italians ("Ellis Islanders" is their term for them). They make a big stink about nobody outside of this founder group talking about America in any shape or form. In his head he's desperately reading clues into my posting to see who I am and if I've ever even been to America. If you say you have, well you're not part of the founding stock obviously, since your rhetoric is that of outsider commenting in, so you're excluded before the debate has already begun.
These guys are like the closest you're going to get to an American "intellectual" on the right, but they still do the irritating thing of shifting language to always make you chase their starting points, just like a lot of leftists do. Make no mistake, this one might be a little more well-spoken but the elephant in the room is that it represents, more or less, the opinion of a lot of Americans who have started grasping onto this historical/ethnic locus as a sort of bludgeoning tool towards those they don't like.
American Blacks aren't free from this tendency either (see: ADOS). In a way it is a logical position to take for those personality types who seek power in society. I think American Natives are the only group that get a legitimate gripe about all this shit in my own opinion.
Doesn't change that Black people built this country. Your psychoanalyzing changes nothing.
Anonymous :
34 days ago :
No.5161
>>5176
>>5161
Sorry the other kids in elementary school made fun of your lunches.
>>5123
>>5095
Doesn't change that Black people built this country. Your psychoanalyzing changes nothing.
Don't bark at me like I'm in your bootcamp. I didn't say one word about your ancestors. In fact the entire point I was making is that people like YOU overemphasize how much they themselves get to draw on what their ancestors did. I am of the opinion that you don't actually have that much in common with your ancestors, socially, culturally, anything but your genes, which is a very flimsy and unfortunate thing to base your temper on no matter where or who your background is.
PS talking about something in the general isn't "psychoanalyzing", what a banal thought-ending cliche.
>>5161
>>5123 Don't bark at me like I'm in your bootcamp. I didn't say one word about your ancestors. In fact the entire point I was making is that people like YOU overemphasize how much they themselves get to draw on what their ancestors did. I am of the opinion that you don't actually have that much in common with your ancestors, socially, culturally, anything but your genes, which is a very flimsy and unfortunate thing to base your temper on no matter where or who your background is.
PS talking about something in the general isn't "psychoanalyzing", what a banal thought-ending cliche.
Sorry the other kids in elementary school made fun of your lunches.
Anonymous :
33 days ago :
No.5185
>>5197
>>5185
Genetics are far more important than is polite to discuss.
Is this really the way you want to act out your political beliefs? The entire thing is a game of putting down other people to give yourself leverage? I suspect you are old enough to know the answer is acting in good faith and trying to build a common society not based on the lottery of genetics. This is why you think I'm psychoanalyzing you, because I'm pointing out your beliefs aren't structured on any sort of even elementary rubric but instead an emotional lashout. I have often said that Americans lack something in maturity even as adults, and even moreso as adults in power. ADOS and you type like the defense guy in the other thread- I wonder if you're a spook? If so, I wish you nothing but the worst
>>5185
Is this really the way you want to act out your political beliefs? The entire thing is a game of putting down other people to give yourself leverage? I suspect you are old enough to know the answer is acting in good faith and trying to build a common society not based on the lottery of genetics. This is why you think I'm psychoanalyzing you, because I'm pointing out your beliefs aren't structured on any sort of even elementary rubric but instead an emotional lashout. I have often said that Americans lack something in maturity even as adults, and even moreso as adults in power. ADOS and you type like the defense guy in the other thread- I wonder if you're a spook? If so, I wish you nothing but the worst
Genetics are far more important than is polite to discuss.
But that's not the gist of what is going on with muh founding stock people. They're not esoteric HBD nerds, not people interested in the finer details of eugenics or human population, and they don't even get the blood and soil geography bonus that other ethnic fascists get, because America so clearly belonged/belongs to the Native population... These white and black Americans are just using their "genetics" as a bludgeon to wield power over their peers. They were here first - except they weren't - so they get a claim to more "Americanness" that others don't. Genes are only the happenstance basis for this cultural purification (see how both whites and blacks nearly completely converge in their rhetoric on this issue). That includes everyone who came after 400 years ago including ethnic groups like Scots-Irish which no one has even bothered to tabulate as foreign or ethnic anymore, even nearly all European white nationalists themselves
I don't even disagree with many of the observations that these people make, which should be clear by my tone, it's merely the fact that they blame immigrants merely existing in the US for the decline in integration when their own government is the one that concocted it in the first place. It's a cultural epithet and status marker disguised as a political ideology.
Ok so I looked the pic up and apparently Trump is the guy in the Roman costume lololol
This image feels different now